ConTech Conversations: ABC’s Mike Bellaman

In Building Dive’s new ConTech Discussions every month column, we communicate with marketplace leaders to study about their companies’ tech adoption and innovation and what the future holds. Do you know a contech professional we should interview? E-mail [email protected].

Mike Bellaman became president and CEO of Affiliated Builders and Contractors in 2011 soon after extra than twenty five yrs in the development marketplace. Building Dive spoke with Bellaman to study extra about his ideas on how the development marketplace has adjusted in terms of tech adoption throughout his job, and what he believes is the industry’s best highway map for tech adoption in the future. 

Editor’s Take note The next interview has been edited for brevity and clarity. 

Building DIVE:  The development marketplace has a reputation for dragging its ft when it comes to adopting new technologies. What is the most crucial factor that a contractor can do to be up to velocity with the most recent technologies? 

MIKE BELLAMAN: On a macro basis, we’ve got 760,000 licensed [U.S.] contractors, 98% of those hire considerably less than a hundred people. So, we are predominantly a little business marketplace. It’s really fragmented. If you just glance all around in your neighborhood, you will most likely see John’s plumbing and Sam’s heating, air flow and air conditioning. You have got house builders, you have got business builders. Then you’ve got mega, infrastructure builders. So, I consider when you glance at the marketplace remaining slow to adopt technologies, it can be genuinely simply because of that fragmentation. 

I labored with a really massive development group and we were being really brief to test to adopt and test new things. That took time and strength and we experienced to be careful about not remaining distracted. Tiny companies, in which the owner of the company might be the head of functions, the head of HR, the head of payroll, the head of basic safety and the head of technologies, it can be rough for them to seize on to all the technologies that is out there. 

You have got startups left and ideal. I wager you if you went again five yrs and seemed at how a lot of companies were being obtaining into the drone business, offering drones was the major fad. Seem again now and see how a lot of of them are nevertheless all around. I wager you you would be having difficulties to locate a lot of of those nevertheless all around.

So, as a little company, do I have time to be distracted by all that sort of fanfare? Do I genuinely want to wager investment decision bucks into new tech until it sticks? Some might say that is a good technique, but I consider that is also a naive technique. 

We know how quickly technologies will work. I consider it was 10 yrs ago the iPad was invented. I would consider every person employs either an iPad or their cellular phone or some handheld gadget that they use to get their drawings, to communicate, to collaborate—whatever it might be. We failed to have that 10 yrs ago. 

Building companies aren’t necessarily out on that primary edge simply because of the marketplace remaining fragmented. So, I consider as soon as the market as a total absorbs these kinds of products the marketplace goes together with it. 

What could the smaller sized contractors who do not have time for the fanfare be accomplishing to preserve up? Are they obtaining the full prospective out of their telephones and tablets?

BELLAMAN: If you use Microsoft Excel or Microsoft Word, I question you happen to be applying it to its fullest prospective, for case in point. The authentic dilemma to ask would be, are we obtaining the most out of our tablets and our products for the work to place in? And I consider the remedy to that is that it is an ongoing discovering system. I study about new apps each day. It comes down to workflow, system flow. Three yrs ago, I failed to have software program for signing documents. Three yrs ago, I failed to have tech for having to pay payments or e-signatures or timesheets and payroll.

They might dip their toe in the drinking water on specified things. There are specified things that are much less difficult to dip your toe into than some others. Some are comprehensive transformations or system reengineering that might have to happen in just an group. I consider it can be got to be uncomplicated. It’s got to be value powerful. 

It’s rough to change technologies ideal in the center of initiatives, in terms of workflow. The moment you start a undertaking, ordinarily you test to finish with that technique. I consider that as the little ones appear out of higher college or college or university and enter into our industry—people that have developed up with the technologies as opposed to discovering the technology—those people are a great deal extra at ease and making an attempt things and that will infect specified methods.

What is the best system for a much larger company to “dip their toe in the drinking water,” as you place it, a tangible, onsite tech answer ahead of applying it? Is it best to examination it out onsite?

BELLAMAN: A great deal of people will locate the ideal undertaking with the ideal staff in just their company, as effectively as the ideal staff in terms of the consumer that they are performing for, associates, subcontractors and consultants.

You have got to have the ideal lifestyle. You know, “Let us test this. Let us test this drone. Let us test this robot. Let us test this. Let us test that.” And ahead of much larger companies are likely to scale nearly anything, they are likely to test it. They’re likely to see how it will work. They’re likely to see if it fits in just their recent workflows. Or if they have to change their workflows, they are likely to communicate about how it interfaces with legacy methods and recent methods. 

I consider the best apply is to say, “Let us give it a go.” Uncover an suitable place in which everybody’s aligned to test it out, see if you will find authentic value. If there is, then we’ll scale its use and software. 

What is anything valuable that you can imagine that is not on the market still? What challenges will tomorrow’s contech be fixing?

BELLAMAN: We are obtaining extra and extra into knowledge and facts. So, no matter what the following breakthrough is, I would imagine it is likely to be anything all around having all that knowledge and remaining equipped to summarize some type of trigger and influence assessment out of it. 

Enable me give you an case in point. Proper now a drone will fly all around a website and consider movie and maybe do that each day. That is a great deal of knowledge. Let us say the undertaking lasts a year and you have all of that movie knowledge that captured progress of the career and movie articles from the same angles or distinct angles each day and you want to study anything from that knowledge. For a human remaining to go by way of that, that would be very tricky. But maybe there would be some way for some method or software program to examine all of that knowledge.

Digital photography is just zeros and types. In chronological purchase you might be equipped to glean from that footage some remarkable insights on what brought about that undertaking to go the way it went, from a timetable standpoint, from a value standpoint, from a basic safety standpoint and from a quality standpoint. But I consider that is just one particular case in point in terms of discovering from all of that knowledge and remaining equipped to system it.  

I was chatting to a company that was seeking at analyzing and making an attempt to glean out of all the e-mail traffic on a career in which the challenges were being likely to be. [They were being] applying the result in words and phrases in e-mail traffic on a undertaking to identify in which there might be some challenges or some options or what they might have been equipped to forecast or what they might have been equipped to study or discern. We are accomplishing a excellent career of collecting the knowledge. The dilemma is are we genuinely applying it as productively as possible?